Hainan Business Nongfushangquan accepted an apology directed at five major doubt to be black hand control testing organizations

1 6, farmer spring receive the "Hainan Province, Haikou City Administration for Industry and Commerce and Industry Bureau Nongfushangquan beverage sampling investigation of the incident briefing." Haikou City of Industry, informed that the working process in the existence of procedural irregularities in the issue.

Nongfushangquan that the Hainan Provincial Industrial and Commercial Bureau of the investigation was serious. Informed review the results in Hainan after Trade and Industry Bureau began to remove the effects of trying to save their image and business losses. But the farmer has failed to spring from the other focus of this event - Hainan Entry Exit Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center receive any instructions.

Nongfushangquan that exist throughout the testing process five of doubt, it is reasonable to suspect that Hainan Entry Exit Inspection and Quarantine Technology Center ("Hainan Entry-Exit Inspection Center" ) in the event the beginning of the test results premeditated manipulation, deliberately no check against the current situation of death.

a doubt: "test failure" is a well-designed bureau

Haikou City of Industry, " circulation of the work product quality monitoring and sampling single "Show Oct. 17 million in the Mountain Road, Long 500ml Nongfuguoyuan detection supermarket samples taken 3 bottles, 3 bottles back up with the sample, a total of 6 bottles. But the technology center in Hainan Province Entry-Exit Inspection and Quarantine, "commissioned by the inspection and quarantine application form" shows only a sample bottle of submission (see annex). This not only with the "fruit and vegetable juice beverage product quality supervision and spot checks the implementation of norms" in the provisions should be taken six products as the test samples not in conformity with, but also with Haikou City of Industry, issued a "circulation of goods quality monitoring sampling work order" indicated by the detection of samples does not match the record for the 3 bottles. Typically, the detection of more than ten indicators to use two sets of samples were detected by physicochemical and microbiological indicators, and keep a bottle of sealed samples for re-examination. Hainan Entry-Exit Inspection Center to receive a bottle of ten indicators of test samples, designed from the start of the non-re-examination of the situation for the future "test failure" and the blame is well prepared.

doubt II: retest retained samples come from?

1 月 5 日 To Hainan Entry-Exit Inspection Centre of the Bureau of Hainan Province "on the acceptance of Haikou City Administration for Industry and unity Nongfushangquan commissioned testing of total arsenic in drink The results exceeded the letter of error "in that" technology center attention on the remaining samples and retest the samples seized the early results of a serious investigation. " Hainan Entry-Exit Inspection Center "commissioned the inspection and quarantine request form" (see annex), "commissioned by the project and the use of inspection and quarantine inspection and quarantine method" column, specified: "just enough test samples, did not remain like." Then the re-examination reserve sample come from?

doubt Three: "re-examination still failed inspection department at higher levels", kept purposely inflicted suspected

doubt Four: "test error" can not explain

Entry-Exit Inspection Center of Hainan, Hainan Province in the induced Trade and Industry Bureau of the letter, seized the early recognition of the results is wrong. Cause incorrect results due to instability caused by the standard curve detection equipment low deviation large testing staff reduced the sample to sample weight, due to increased sample dilution. While the three unqualified report the detection of the three test dates are not on the same day the order is also discontinuous. The number three reports are: 21200901305,21200901312, and 21200901328. This deviation can not be the standard curve and sample dilution factor to explain the reasons and large systematic errors.

doubt Friday: Hainan, two entry-exit inspection center position, which plays a lie?

11 月 30 日 Wushu Liang, director of Hainan Entry-Exit Inspection Center told Xinhua and other media statement: the test results can be responsible, saying, "The technical center has done two parallel samples and a blank sample, found that excessive levels of total arsenic test results are basically the same. We accept inspection before the sample size enough to check the sample is sealed well, testing procedures are not a problem "and" The center has a "food total arsenic and inorganic arsenic in the determination of "project testing qualifications, the Sept. 23 this year, the center has just passed its annual inspection equipment calibration and testing measurement instruments, testing equipment is in good running condition, but also for the detection of the test who is a senior engineer of 10 years of analysis experience. "

and January 4 in the unit to Hainan Provincial Industrial and Commercial Bureau of the letter explained:" The results of the early review The main reason is wrong: First, the total arsenic for atomic fluorescence spectrometry detection sensitivity decreased. The instrument used for almost nine years, after initial inspection on the day of the instrument to draw a standard curve analysis, instrument status was unstable , particularly low standard deviation of a large curve on the test result had an impact. Second, the sample preparation method is not strictly according to the standard sample and said constant volume. testing personnel in order to shorten test time, reduced the sample to sample weight, plus large a sample dilution factor, which state of instability in the instrument, the more big the deviation of the value of the probability of detection. "

not support re-examination report, November 30 How Wushu Liang Director issued such a strong position.

as a national testing organization, as a food safety inspection of weights and measures, Hainan Entry-Exit Inspection Center Why lie repeatedly in public? Not accept the entry-exit inspection center in Hainan affected units and technical advice, do not accept the news media interviews, then who will protect the impartiality of law enforcement, who will ensure the people's food security. Although the incident Nongfushangquan report to the Hainan Provincial Public Security, but has not been formally placed on file.

Nongfushangquan that can not accept the entry-exit Inspection and Quarantine Bureau of Hainan Technology Center to say the so-called detection error. Detection process shady Nongfushangquan testing organizations suspected of being black hand still manipulated, I hope the judiciary intervene as soon as possible, restore the real process of the event.

3